Make the decisions, one at a time,
with the rule in front of you

Worked files in two sets. Subjects runs the elements of a claim in torts, contracts, and property. Foundations runs the tools of the first weeks: using precedent, weighing authority, choosing a court, motion practice, appeals, and federal power. In every file you mark the facts doing legal work, connect them to the rule, and test the reasoning from several sides. Every interaction is a selection or an assembly. There is nothing to type.

This page comes after ECHO outlining, not instead of it. Meyer and Noël’s point is that practice attempted before the knowledge exists is not practice at all. So each file can sit your own outline of the topic beside the supplied rule pack, and ends by asking whether your outline would have got you there. If it wouldn’t have, the repair is in the outline.

What this can and cannot show. Choosing and assembling supplied reasoning builds real competence, and it is not the same thing as producing the analysis yourself on a blank page. A good score here means you can recognise and connect the pieces when they are in front of you. Before each reveal you will be offered a chance to close the interface and explain your reasoning aloud — that part is unscored, self-reported, and the closest this page gets to the real task.
Progress is stored on this device only. Clearing your browser data erases it.

—